Monday, January 22, 2007

Globalisation shakes the world

By Steve Schifferes
Economics reporter, BBC News, Bangalore
 
Globalisation is a word that is on everyone's lips these days, from politicians to businessmen. BBC News is launching a major examination of the subject.

Few places in the world have seen the dramatic effects of globalisation more than Bangalore, the Silicon Valley of India, which is experiencing an unprecedented IT boom that is transforming the prospects of the Indian economy.

Globalisation is blamed for many of the ills of the modern world, but it is also praised for bringing unprecedented prosperity.

But what is globalisation, and what are the forces that are shaping it?

South Korean vacation for kids includes a Millitary Boot Camp training!

Published: January 21, 2007
 
POHANG, South Korea: Spitting plumes of white smoke, a wave of South Korean Marine Corps amphibious assault vehicles storms the freezing cold beach. Drill sergeants huddled in the cold compare it to the U.S. military's World War II landings in Normandy.

"It's the same stuff you see in the Hollywood movie 'Saving Private Ryan,'" one says.

Inside the armored vehicles, schoolchildren huddle in oversized helmets and camouflage fatigues, their terrified bodies trembling like Jell-O. Oblivious to the ear-numbing noise from the revving engine, one girl snaps open a hand-held mirror to check her face before the landing. A 14-year-old boy dozes all the way to the beach.

"Some of these kids are hard cases to crack," says Sergeant 1st Class Shim Sang Kyu, a crew-cut marine, barking above the noise. "Our task is to reconstruct them into a better specimen of human being. We train them in the Marine spirit."

Each year, during summer and winter vacations, thousands of schoolchildren pass through this seashore boot camp of South Korea's 1st Marine Corps Division in Pohang, an industrial town on the southeast coast. The program is designed to instill in teenagers perseverance, confidence and teamwork — values cherished by South Korean parents who grew up through the deprivation of the postwar years.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/01/21/news/camp.php

Beijing's satellite blast reverberates in Washington

Published: January 21, 2007
 
HONG KONG: China's growing pride and self-assertion have over-reached themselves dangerously.
 
Future historians may well see Beijing's use of a missile to destroy an old weather satellite as having more lasting global impact than the Iraq war.
 
For the present, China's action has focused attention on a potential threat to U.S. security at least as great as any emanating from the Middle East.

For now, the response of the United States and its allies will be confined to public statements and diplomatic protests. But the longer-term reaction in terms of threat perceptions and the technological and spending answers to them will be crucial and could be huge. Meanwhile, the missile event will not make it any easier for the United States and China to find a way out of tensions arising from their huge trade imbalance.

In a narrow sense, China had every right to use one of its own rockets to destroy its own obsolete satellites. Beijing could argue that it was exercising its own right to unilateral action to protect its national interests in the same way that the United States has so often done during the Bush administration. The United States itself once destroyed old satellites and in August reiterated its opposition to a formal ban on space weaponry or on any restrictions on its space activities.

But that is not the point. In the first place, China's action offends against the informal international understanding that had long existed to desist from sending weapons into space, and to avoiding filling space with the debris of exploded satellites that could put other satellites out of action.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/01/21/opinion/edbowring.php

Indian space capsule returns to Earth

By Pallava Bagla
Monday, January 22, 2007 (Thiruvananthapuram):
Indian scientists for the first time have safely guided a space capsule back to Earth.

Indian space agency ISRO said the capsule splashed down in the Bay of Bengal. It added, efforts are underway to locate it and bring it ashore. Scientists will see if all experiments have gone as planned and most importantly if the ceramic tiles served their purpose.

Only three other countries, Russia, America and China have mastered this complex technology. It is seen as India's first steps towards undertaking a manned mission.

The 550 kg capsule was planned to land 140 km east off the coast of Sriharikota.
 

Friday, January 19, 2007

Kenyan Muslims protest harassment over Somalia

Fri Jan 19, 2007 2:33pm ET
 
By David Mageria and Jeremy Clarke

NAIROBI (Reuters) - Carrying anti-Bush and anti-Ethiopia placards, hundreds of Kenyan Muslims rallied on Friday to accuse authorities of unfair arrests and increased harassment due to the crisis in neighboring Somalia.

At a peaceful meeting after Friday prayers outside Nairobi's main mosque, the protesters said Kenya was currying favor with Washington by cracking down on Muslims suspected of sympathy toward or links with Somalia's ousted Islamists.

"Every Kenyan Muslim is an Islamist. We are not apologetic about it, we are not begging, we were born Muslims, Islam is our religion," said Abdullahi Abdi, the chairman of National

Muslim Leaders Forum. "The message is clear, we are being pushed to the wall, we are under siege and we must stand up for our rights."

Placards read: "Satan is embodied in Bush!", "Due process, not bombs",

"Kenya stop aiding U.S./Ethiopia terrorism."

One of the organizers, Alamin Kimathi, said: "Today we are sad and very angry ... We have turned into a country which is given orders by the U.S. on what to do."

Muslim leaders said Kenya had shown a lack of consistency because it had regularly invited the Somali Islamists to Nairobi for dialogue and then treated them as terrorists.

"Without any reason, it has changed its policy on Somalia ... instead of pursuing dialogue it has now decided to attack Somalia," said Billow Kerrow, a Muslim member of parliament, referring to Kenya's deployment of troops around its border.

http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=topNews&storyid=2007-01-19T193227Z_01_L19350709_RTRUKOT_0_TEXT0.xml&WTmodLoc=NewsArt-L1-RelatedNews-3

U.S. plans broad attack on Iran: US Intelligence Analyst

Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:49pm ET18
 
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. contingency planning for military action against Iran's nuclear program goes beyond limited strikes and would effectively unleash a war against the country, a former U.S. intelligence analyst said on Friday.

"I've seen some of the planning ... You're not talking about a surgical strike," said Wayne White, who was a top Middle East analyst for the State Department's bureau of intelligence and research until March 2005.

"You're talking about a war against Iran" that likely would destabilize the Middle East for years, White told the Middle East Policy Council, a Washington think tank.

"We're not talking about just surgical strikes against an array of targets inside Iran. We're talking about clearing a path to the targets" by taking out much of the Iranian Air Force, Kilo submarines, anti-ship missiles that could target commerce or U.S. warships in the Gulf, and maybe even Iran's ballistic missile capability, White said.

"I'm much more worried about the consequences of a U.S. or Israeli attack against Iran's nuclear infrastructure," which would prompt vigorous Iranian retaliation, he said, than civil war in Iraq, which could be confined to that country.

http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2007-01-20T004912Z_01_N19368342_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAN-USA-EXPERTS.xml

 

 

Tuesday, January 16, 2007

Five Minutes to Doomsday

 
The Doomsday Clock is ticking while most of us are burying our heads in the sand ..
 
 
 
On January 17, 2007 the Doomsday Clock, presently set at seven minutes to midnight, is set to be moved forward by its caretaker The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists. This symbolic gesture reflects the sense of foreboding experienced by many in the face of wars, nuclear and biological weapons proliferation, terrorism and global warming. Rarely has our planet been as threatened. Rarely has the human race thrust humankind into such jeopardy.

As if erratic weather systems, tsunamis, melting icecaps, fast disappearing species, disease and poverty wasn't enough for the world's leaders to tackle, it seems we have taken to shamelessly annihilating each other. Our politicians and generals even have nice words for this phenomena, like cleansing, subduing, pacifying; words that all translate into someone's death.

The individuals who wield the tools of such destruction are worshipped as "the nation's finest". They are always the good guys; the victims of their missiles, bombs and torture camps, always the rogues.

Rogues like the nomadic herdsmen bombed with their livestock in Somalia; rogues like the village folk buried under a bomb crater in Pakistan; rogues like the celebrants at wedding parties in Afghanistan and Iraq, who ended up in coffins or attending funerals. Human beings with shared hopes and dreams reduced to collateral damage in the time it takes a pilot to push a button.

The corporate media is complicit, either wittingly or unwittingly, in prettying up our side. The inherent biases of its owners and editors manipulate the truth, its reliance on advertising revenues means pandering to the comfort zone of its readership, which must never be offended by photographs of dead babies or kill ratios.

Let's face it. Most Westerners don't want to know what their governments are doing in their name or on which new atrocity their taxes are being squandered. The celebrity antics in the Big Brother House, the worst-dressed list, the closure of Britney Spears' fan club and prices at the pump hold far more allure.

If anything Western publics are guilty of willful ignorance. The proof: Despite all evidence to the contrary, some 20 percent of Americans still believe Saddam Hussein was involved with Sept. 11. That's more than 70 million educated people with access to first world communications, satellite television and the Internet. Unless those millions are chronically intellectually-challenged there can be no excuse.

At the same time the Arab world is steeped in apathy. During a visit to a Cairo dentist's office at the time of the Israel-Lebanon conflict, I asked that the television be switched from a Nancy Ajram video clip to Al Jazeera. To my surprise, my fellow patients, who had been glued to the gyrations on the set moments earlier, ignored the news, preferring to flick through glossy magazines or chat.

Then on the first day of Eid Al-Adha when Saddam Hussein was hanged I noticed a noisy large crowd surrounding the wide-screen television in the forecourt of a well-known Italian-style coffee shop in downtown Cairo. What was all the excitement about? No, not the indignity suffered by a former Arab leader but an almost-scored goal during a local football match.

What are we doing? The Doomsday Clock is ticking while most of us are burying our heads in the sand. Are mendacious politicians and widespread injustices turning us into ostriches or automatons content to spend our lives playing with our fancy gadgets? Have you ever watched the Oprah show when she hands out gifts to the audience? Well-dressed adults actually swoon over a free BlackBerry or a bottle of perfume.

Isn't it about time we decided to own the state of our world, to use a favorite Oprah expression? Politicians do what they do because they can get away with it. We get our mind-numbing toys and they keep their power. The checks and balances on that power should be us. If we don't strive for awareness and speak up, then who will?

Let's assume you're unable to relate to the plight of the Palestinian people, the millions displaced from Western Sudan or Iraqis embroiled in a civil war triggered by a US-led invasion or the post-war suffering of the Lebanese.

Let's suppose you care not a jot that the polar bear has joined the endangered list or that the planet is fast heating up to unacceptable levels. It's easy to shrug ones shoulders, ignore the headlines and turn the channel.

But will we be able to avert our eyes from a nuclear conflagration so easily? Wake up folks! Nuclear North Korea is being isolated and squeezed. Nuclear Pakistan is being accused of harboring Al-Qaeda. Iran, which may have acquired ready-made nuclear weapons and certainly does have chemical and biological weapons, is being openly aggressed.

If the Doomsday hands hit midnight, no one but no one should be allowed to get away with saying "I didn't know".

 Linda Heard is a British editor, journalist and columnist currently based in Cairo where she is a correspondent for Arab News. She can be reached at sierra12th@yahoo.co.uk

Canadian House of Commons passes QUEBEC NATION motion

Updated Mon. Nov. 27 2006 11:32 PM ET

CTV.ca News Staff

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20061127/quebec_motion_061127/20061127?hub=TopStories

The House of Commons has passed a motion that defines the Quebecois as "a united Nation within Canada." The majority of Conservative and Liberal MPs supported the motion, along with the Bloc Quebecois and New Democrats. The vote passed 266 to 16.

Among the MPs who voted against the motion were Liberal leadership candidate Ken Dryden and independent MP Garth Turner. Tory MP Michael Chong had earlier resigned from his post as the intergovernmental affairs minister so he could abstain from voting. Peter Van Loan, a Conservative MP who represents the Ontario riding of York-Simcoe, has taken Chong's place.

"I believe in this great country of ours, and I believe in one nation undivided, called Canada," said Chong in a press conference hours before the vote.

"This is a fundamental principle for me, and not something I can, or will, compromise -- not now, not ever. While I'm loyal to my party and to my leader, my first loyalty is to my country."

The motion is largely seen as a symbolic recognition of the Quebecois nation. But Chong argued it "is nothing else but the recognition of ethnic nationalism, and that is something I cannot support. It cannot be interpreted as the recognition of a territorial nationalism, or it does not refer to the geographic entity, but to a group of people."

CTV's Ottawa Bureau Chief Robert Fife said the impact of Chong's resignation could "reverberate across the country."

"You don't want to lose a cabinet minister, particularly the minister in charge of intergovernmental affairs -- the minister who actually deals with the provinces and is responsible for national unity," Fife told CTV's Newsnet.

Independent MP Garth Turner told The Canadian Press that other Tory MPs are upset about the motion as well.

Chong's riding is Wellington-Halton Hills, just west of Toronto and adjacent to Turner's riding of Halton. Turner was kicked out of the Tory caucus earlier this fall.

Harper tabled the Quebec motion in response to the following Bloc motion, to be introduced Thursday: "That this House recognize that Quebeckers form a nation."

Liberal leadership candidate Michael Ignatieff voted in favour of Harper's motion on Monday -- a move met with loud applause in the House.

Gerard Kennedy, another leadership candidate, has said he motion is divisive to national unity and could advance the separatist agenda.

Muslim sitcom off to a big start in Canada

Published: January 15, 2007
 
 
TORONTO: When it comes to producing a funny television show or movie in Canada, producers here have a reliable stable of topics — French-English relations, urban-rural dynamics and anything that involves a bumbling politician or the United States.

But Islam — something of a third rail of comedy throughout the Western world — did not make the list, which is one reason the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's new situation comedy, "Little Mosque on the Prairie," is attracting such attention here.

"It is a risk doing a sitcom about what can be considered a very touchy subject," said Kirstine Layfield, executive director of network programming at the CBC.

But the series premiere last Tuesday attracted 2.1 million viewers, impressive in a country where an audience of one million is a runaway hit. The CBC has not had a show draw an audience of that size in a decade, according to the network.

The show follows a small group of Muslims in, of all places, a prairie town in Saskatchewan where, in the first epsiode, the group was trying to establish a mosque in the parish hall of a town church. A passerby, seeing the group praying, rushes to call a "terrorist hot line," to report Muslims praying "just like on CNN," which touches off a local firestorm.

"I want the broader society to look at us as normal, with the same issues and concerns as anyone else," said Nawaz, who based the series loosely on her own experiences as a Muslim woman who moved from Toronto to the prairie. "We're just as much a part of the Canadian fabric as anyone else."

The CBC has committed to eight episodes of the program, and is negotiating with the show's producers for 13 more in the spring. But despite the initial success of "Little Mosque on the Prairie" the network is still proceeding with caution, having hired a consultant to flag anything in the scripts that could offend audiences.

The show has generally been well received by Muslim leaders, who welcome the light touch it brings to issues that are normally debated in numbing seriousness.

"Muslims are a bit late in laughing at themselves, but we have to use humor to remedy these divisions just like any community," said Mohamed Elmasry, an imam and president of the Canadian Islamic Congress.

Eric Margolis - Bush's fourth war against the Muslims

Sun, January 14, 2007
 
 
 
NEW YORK -- In his memorable, 1961 farewell speech, U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower warned Americans to avoid foreign entanglements and beware the growing power of the military-industrial complex.

It was sharply ironic to see American air strikes being launched this week from the decks of the mighty attack carrier USS Eisenhower against the remote East African nation of Somalia.

"The U.S. has opened a fourth front in the war on terrorism," trumpeted the Pentagon, as if it did not have enough failing wars on its hands.

U.S. warplanes and special forces attacked Somalia from the sea and from the U.S. base at Djibouti. Other U.S. units deployed on the Kenya-Somalia border. Much of Somalia is already occupied by Ethiopia's powerful, U.S.-financed army. Ethiopia invaded defenseless Somalia, with Washington's blessing, under cover of the Christmas holiday.

But was Somalia really a "hotbed of terrorism" as Washington claimed? The U.S.-Ethiopian invasion of Somalia was sparked by last fall's defeat of corrupt Somali warlords armed and financed by the CIA. They had kept Somalia in turmoil and near anarchy for 15 years. Last year, a group of Muslim jurists and notables, the Union of Islamic Courts, managed to defeat the warlords and impose law and order on chaotic Somalia.

The conservative Islamic Courts were sympathetic to pan-Muslim causes. But they were not involved in anti-American jihadist movements and had no identifiable links, as Washington loudly claimed, to al-Qaida. Four or five African suspects on the 1998 bombing of U.S. Embassies in East Africa may have been in Somalia, but going to war against a sovereign nation to try to assassinate or capture a handful of suspects (some reportedly escaped) is like using a nuclear weapon to kill a gnat and is sure to generate more anti-U.S. violence.

But in line with increasing militarization of U.S. foreign policy, the Pentagon's new golden-haired boys, Special Operations Command, pushed aside the humiliated CIA and the feckless State Department and vowed to "drain the Islamic swamp" in Somalia.

Thus begins U.S.President George W. Bush's fourth war against the Muslim world. He failed dismally to capture Osama bin Laden, conquer Iraq, or pacify Afghanistan. Dirt-poor, defenceless Somalia is Bush's last stab at glory.

Once again, the administration is recklessly charging into a thicket of tribal politics in a remote nation it knows nothing about. U.S. policy in Somalia is being driven by rabid neocons seeking jihad against the entire Muslim world, by gung-ho, know-nothing generals, and self-serving advice from ally Ethiopia. Eritrea's 1993 secession took away Ethiopia's natural access to the sea, leaving it landlocked. Ethiopia's prime goal in Somalia is seizing one or more deep-water ports, turning Somalia into a protectorate, and crushing any Islamic movements that might inflame its own voiceless Muslims.

America's attack on Somalia recalls Afghanistan. The U.S. is again blundering into ancient clan and tribal conflicts, using foreign troops and local mercenaries to defend a hated puppet regime without any popular support. Unfortunately, the word "Islamic" triggers murderous, knee jerk reactions by Washington's war party and the Pentagon's dimmer generals. The only good Muslim is a dead Muslim. As U.S. soldiers once said in that earlier counter-terrorism success, Vietnam, "Kill 'em all, let God sort 'em out."

Like Afghanistan, Somalia was easy to invade, but may prove very difficult to rule or eventually leave. The invading Ethiopians, blood foes of Somalis, were not greeted with flowers, as U.S. neocons again promised. Somalis saw the U.S. and Ethiopians as invaders, and the now scattered Islamic Courts militias as their best hope for stability and normalcy.

The White House is using puny Somalia as a straw man to be set up and knocked down. "War president" Bush desperately needs a victory in his bungled "war on terror." After three defeats, a fake victory over a fake Islamic threat in obscure Somalia is just the kind of jolly news Bush & Co. hopes will cheer gloomy Americans and divert attention from the disaster in Iraq.